Skip to main content

One problem in American Democracy: The Media




In school, there was a class called P.A.D. It stood for Problems in American Democracy,   and this was supposed to be a newer version of the old Civics classes given to high school students. There are several problems to be sure in our 21st century version of democracy. One major problem is the media. The problem lies with the role of the media in elections and also in the role of the free press in questioning our leaders and elected officials.

With history as a guide, we see the problems that arose in the lead-up to the Iraq war. History has been repeating itself with this 2016 election. If you recall the excitement after 9/11, when the media couldn't hide their delight in becoming"embeds" in the military invasion of Iraq, this was problematic at the time. I remember watching the BBC to get some type of rational coverage and perhaps some questioning over why we were invading this country. But if the networks see a ratings boom, they don't question the whys or the wherefore's of any given situation. They simply exist to spew out the talking points given to them. That is why there's an implicitly negative view of the media from both the right and the left. 

It's just not true that they are bias in favor of the left. They are not innately in favor of left-wing causes and political figures. What they really like to see is something new and different. Anything they consider staid or boring is old news, and therefore is treated as such. Hillary Clinton was dogged throughout the campaign about her e-mails and her dealings at the State Department. Trump's diverse and problematic business entanglements were barely mentioned, but for a few lone reporters.  And the phenomenon of Trump and his initial entrance into the race became a bonanza for media outlets to exploit and to broadcast nightly pronouncements of everything Trump said and every speech he gave.  His conflicts of interest, his shady business deals and partnerships, his lack of transparency and failure to show his taxes are shining examples of the hypocrisy and the abject failures of the national media at large. Nothing was questioned, everything was exploited for the biggest possible market share of viewers.

Of course, at this stage the media delights in the ongoing chaos of the Trump Transition team. They didn't like Clinton or the prospect of a boringly predictable agenda. This is the shiny new object they salivate over. Never mind if it's hurting or helping the country. Much like the GOP Congress, who met to oppose Obama as he was sworn in, the media stands to reap the benefits of covering the trials and tribulations and (in their mind-the hopeful) implosions of this Trump administration. This is one of the major under-reported problems coming out of Election Season 2016. One of the major problems in American Democracy is the Corporate Media and their pre-fabricated talking points which are spewed out accordingly. One of the best satirical pieces on SNL was not the coverage of the debates or the election, but a recent skit that poked fun at one of the major cable news networks, CNN, and their endless supply of banal and robotic talking points which are delivered on a nightly basis. This is not the only Problem in American Democracy, but it's one of the most under-reported problems in our democracy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Top 5 Under the Radar Stories

  Here's another installment of our popular Under the Radar series. Check out the new "Under the Radar" online magazine to read even more stories that may have been under-reported.   1)       Surging Foreign Arm Sales:   Sales surged 36% in 2015 and are set to remain strong in the coming years. ISIS has fueled demand among our allies for US missile defense equipment, helicopters and munitions. 10 years ago, the focus was on fighter jets. Europe, the Pacific and even Centcom have provided the demands. The total value of sales in the works is around 500 billion dollars.The Pentagon vets all requests, including those from countries with weak human rights records.   2)       139 Countries get power from Renewables :   There is a blueprint released within the last few years giving details of how all 50 US States may run on renewables by the year 2050.   The plans include wind turbines, solar...

Are we even asking the right questions?

    What is this about really? Are we somehow conflating this withdrawal with the idea of America as a superpower?  Is it about American Exceptionalism and the idea that we have lost our innocence? Is this something that we will use to justify what we are doing in the world; where we are going, and what we want to be known for in the world? Just asking what we want to stand would be a good start in terms of questions going forward. This may be a conversation that needs to be had in the coming years. All of the talk,   and the hopes and aspirations were discussed and mapped out before being put into the small 21st Century online political group that was created in 2017. The thoughts & ideas came from a hopeful take on the dark reflections seen in the election of Trump in 2016. Are we a country and a people that are even capable of building a better tomorrow?   We need to be able to have this serious talk with Allies and others of good will;   T...

Hillary and the Man in the Arena

From the standpoint of one who voted for and endorsed Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton, there seems to be a question hanging in the air. How could someone who opposed the Clintonian dynasty support Hillary’s bid for the Presidency? Isn’t it a bit hypocritical? Or at least inconsistent with the view previously taken? This is true for many supporters of Obama. Some on the left cannot support her bid for President.They see many of her acknowledged flaws and conclude she cannot be a viable option. My view comes from watching her over the course of the past eight years, four as the Secretary of State within this Administration. And having watched the two debate in 2008- Obama vs. Hillary- there can be little question that the divide that separates them on most issues is a small one. Theirs is a centrist left view of the world. On Foreign Policy, I daresay that Hillary would never have worked for Obama had she held wildly opposing views from his own world view. But the...