With the success of Senator Chris Murphy’s
filibuster this past week, perhaps the need for more of the highly entertaining
spectacles, which many can understand better than the dull business of daily
speeches and boring legislation on the Senate floor, might light a fire in the
American electorate. Since the principle of the thing is at issue, why not
screw your courage to the sticking place and come up with day long filibusters
on the Senate floor to protest the lack of action on….
Why not…? For Supreme Court Justice Merrick Garland?
Since there is a vacancy that affects almost every area of
our life, why can’t they even give this man a vote?
Or…The Iraq War Vote….? The Authorization for Use of Force in
Iraq and Syria? How can the State Department go ahead with a protest of 50 diplomats
demanding action in the form of air strikes on Assad when there is no resolution
for Military Action from the entire Congress?
Or…The Infrastructure Bill that never got passed?
How can the crumbling infrastructure so desperately needed
in all 50 states take a back burner to all the military and spending projects
abroad we have poured money into over the past fifteen years?
What about…The Immigration Bill that was allowed to die when
Boehner decided to never bring it to the floor for a vote? One of the issues of
our time is Immigration Reform. Why not bring it to the floor to shed light on
it?
Or…a Bi-Partisan “Grand Bargain” bill that would help secure
Social Security & Medicare? Another of the issues of our time, Income
Inequality, could be a major factor-including the raising of the minimum wage.
In days past when the Senate actually worked, there would have been some back
and forth haggling and they would have compromised on the raising of the minimum
wage and reached a bi-partisan agreement to raise it incrementally over a
period of several years. The dirty words now are: Bi-Partisan Agreement &
Compromise, neither of which are recognized by either side, but especially the
Tea Party/Trump wing of the GOP.
Why not….the Sequester and Military Spending?
Why can’t the Congress debate the money that was
automatically cut in programs because of the Sequester, a cowardly way to force
Congress to act, rather than to openly debate the subject of our excessive
Military Spending-higher than the next seven countries combined-and the need to
invest in modern technology instead of continuing to inflate what Eisenhower
correctly summarized as the Industrial Military Complex? We need to debate the
merits of reduction of the number of military bases and the urgent need to make
Veterans Health a priority in the Military Budgets of the Future!
Why not Filibuster…Campaign Finance Reform Laws? Which are
gutted as we now know the McCain Feingold Act has been? Filibuster to vote to
repeal Citizens United-which would bring to light the Dark Money found in PAC’s
and the need for more transparency and openness in Campaign Spending.
Why not Filibuster….the gutting of Dodd-Frank? And why not bring
to light the lobbyists in Corporate America and Wall Street who are trying to
eliminate any and all forms of Consumer Finance Protection Laws, championed by
Elizabeth Warren? Throw Bernie a bone, why don’t you, and let him lead the
fight on the floor with Elizabeth! Perhaps his young army of followers will
glean a better understanding of the laws and the process that makes our Government
work, and also shuts our Government down!
Comments
Post a Comment