Skip to main content

Filibusters for Everyone!


 
 

With the success of Senator Chris Murphy’s filibuster this past week, perhaps the need for more of the highly entertaining spectacles, which many can understand better than the dull business of daily speeches and boring legislation on the Senate floor, might light a fire in the American electorate. Since the principle of the thing is at issue, why not screw your courage to the sticking place and come up with day long filibusters on the Senate floor to protest the lack of action on….


 

Why not…? For Supreme Court Justice Merrick Garland?

Since there is a vacancy that affects almost every area of our life, why can’t they even give this man a vote?

 

Or…The Iraq War Vote….?  The Authorization for Use of Force in Iraq and Syria? How can the State Department go ahead with a protest of 50 diplomats demanding action in the form of air strikes on Assad when there is no resolution for Military Action from the entire Congress?

 

Or…The Infrastructure Bill that never got passed?

How can the crumbling infrastructure so desperately needed in all 50 states take a back burner to all the military and spending projects abroad we have poured money into over the past fifteen years?

 

What about…The Immigration Bill that was allowed to die when Boehner decided to never bring it to the floor for a vote? One of the issues of our time is Immigration Reform. Why not bring it to the floor to shed light on it?


 

Or…a Bi-Partisan “Grand Bargain” bill that would help secure Social Security & Medicare? Another of the issues of our time, Income Inequality, could be a major factor-including the raising of the minimum wage. In days past when the Senate actually worked, there would have been some back and forth haggling and they would have compromised on the raising of the minimum wage and reached a bi-partisan agreement to raise it incrementally over a period of several years. The dirty words now are: Bi-Partisan Agreement & Compromise, neither of which are recognized by either side, but especially the Tea Party/Trump wing of the GOP.

 


Why not….the Sequester and Military Spending?

Why can’t the Congress debate the money that was automatically cut in programs because of the Sequester, a cowardly way to force Congress to act, rather than to openly debate the subject of our excessive Military Spending-higher than the next seven countries combined-and the need to invest in modern technology instead of continuing to inflate what Eisenhower correctly summarized as the Industrial Military Complex? We need to debate the merits of  reduction of  the number of  military bases and the urgent need to make Veterans Health a priority in the Military Budgets of the Future!

 


Why not Filibuster…Campaign Finance Reform Laws? Which are gutted as we now know the McCain Feingold Act has been? Filibuster to vote to repeal Citizens United-which would bring to light the Dark Money found in PAC’s and the need for more transparency and openness in Campaign Spending.



 

Why not Filibuster….the gutting of Dodd-Frank? And why not bring to light the lobbyists in Corporate America and Wall Street who are trying to eliminate any and all forms of Consumer Finance Protection Laws, championed by Elizabeth Warren? Throw Bernie a bone, why don’t you, and let him lead the fight on the floor with Elizabeth! Perhaps his young army of followers will glean a better understanding of the laws and the process that makes our Government work, and also shuts our Government down!
 
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Top 5 Under the Radar Stories

  Here's another installment of our popular Under the Radar series. Check out the new "Under the Radar" online magazine to read even more stories that may have been under-reported.   1)       Surging Foreign Arm Sales:   Sales surged 36% in 2015 and are set to remain strong in the coming years. ISIS has fueled demand among our allies for US missile defense equipment, helicopters and munitions. 10 years ago, the focus was on fighter jets. Europe, the Pacific and even Centcom have provided the demands. The total value of sales in the works is around 500 billion dollars.The Pentagon vets all requests, including those from countries with weak human rights records.   2)       139 Countries get power from Renewables :   There is a blueprint released within the last few years giving details of how all 50 US States may run on renewables by the year 2050.   The plans include wind turbines, solar...

Are we even asking the right questions?

    What is this about really? Are we somehow conflating this withdrawal with the idea of America as a superpower?  Is it about American Exceptionalism and the idea that we have lost our innocence? Is this something that we will use to justify what we are doing in the world; where we are going, and what we want to be known for in the world? Just asking what we want to stand would be a good start in terms of questions going forward. This may be a conversation that needs to be had in the coming years. All of the talk,   and the hopes and aspirations were discussed and mapped out before being put into the small 21st Century online political group that was created in 2017. The thoughts & ideas came from a hopeful take on the dark reflections seen in the election of Trump in 2016. Are we a country and a people that are even capable of building a better tomorrow?   We need to be able to have this serious talk with Allies and others of good will;   T...

Hillary and the Man in the Arena

From the standpoint of one who voted for and endorsed Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton, there seems to be a question hanging in the air. How could someone who opposed the Clintonian dynasty support Hillary’s bid for the Presidency? Isn’t it a bit hypocritical? Or at least inconsistent with the view previously taken? This is true for many supporters of Obama. Some on the left cannot support her bid for President.They see many of her acknowledged flaws and conclude she cannot be a viable option. My view comes from watching her over the course of the past eight years, four as the Secretary of State within this Administration. And having watched the two debate in 2008- Obama vs. Hillary- there can be little question that the divide that separates them on most issues is a small one. Theirs is a centrist left view of the world. On Foreign Policy, I daresay that Hillary would never have worked for Obama had she held wildly opposing views from his own world view. But the...