Skip to main content

Filibusters for Everyone!


 
 

With the success of Senator Chris Murphy’s filibuster this past week, perhaps the need for more of the highly entertaining spectacles, which many can understand better than the dull business of daily speeches and boring legislation on the Senate floor, might light a fire in the American electorate. Since the principle of the thing is at issue, why not screw your courage to the sticking place and come up with day long filibusters on the Senate floor to protest the lack of action on….


 

Why not…? For Supreme Court Justice Merrick Garland?

Since there is a vacancy that affects almost every area of our life, why can’t they even give this man a vote?

 

Or…The Iraq War Vote….?  The Authorization for Use of Force in Iraq and Syria? How can the State Department go ahead with a protest of 50 diplomats demanding action in the form of air strikes on Assad when there is no resolution for Military Action from the entire Congress?

 

Or…The Infrastructure Bill that never got passed?

How can the crumbling infrastructure so desperately needed in all 50 states take a back burner to all the military and spending projects abroad we have poured money into over the past fifteen years?

 

What about…The Immigration Bill that was allowed to die when Boehner decided to never bring it to the floor for a vote? One of the issues of our time is Immigration Reform. Why not bring it to the floor to shed light on it?


 

Or…a Bi-Partisan “Grand Bargain” bill that would help secure Social Security & Medicare? Another of the issues of our time, Income Inequality, could be a major factor-including the raising of the minimum wage. In days past when the Senate actually worked, there would have been some back and forth haggling and they would have compromised on the raising of the minimum wage and reached a bi-partisan agreement to raise it incrementally over a period of several years. The dirty words now are: Bi-Partisan Agreement & Compromise, neither of which are recognized by either side, but especially the Tea Party/Trump wing of the GOP.

 


Why not….the Sequester and Military Spending?

Why can’t the Congress debate the money that was automatically cut in programs because of the Sequester, a cowardly way to force Congress to act, rather than to openly debate the subject of our excessive Military Spending-higher than the next seven countries combined-and the need to invest in modern technology instead of continuing to inflate what Eisenhower correctly summarized as the Industrial Military Complex? We need to debate the merits of  reduction of  the number of  military bases and the urgent need to make Veterans Health a priority in the Military Budgets of the Future!

 


Why not Filibuster…Campaign Finance Reform Laws? Which are gutted as we now know the McCain Feingold Act has been? Filibuster to vote to repeal Citizens United-which would bring to light the Dark Money found in PAC’s and the need for more transparency and openness in Campaign Spending.



 

Why not Filibuster….the gutting of Dodd-Frank? And why not bring to light the lobbyists in Corporate America and Wall Street who are trying to eliminate any and all forms of Consumer Finance Protection Laws, championed by Elizabeth Warren? Throw Bernie a bone, why don’t you, and let him lead the fight on the floor with Elizabeth! Perhaps his young army of followers will glean a better understanding of the laws and the process that makes our Government work, and also shuts our Government down!
 
 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hillary and the Man in the Arena

From the standpoint of one who voted for and endorsed Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton, there seems to be a question hanging in the air. How could someone who opposed the Clintonian dynasty support Hillary’s bid for the Presidency? Isn’t it a bit hypocritical? Or at least inconsistent with the view previously taken? This is true for many supporters of Obama. Some on the left cannot support her bid for President.They see many of her acknowledged flaws and conclude she cannot be a viable option. My view comes from watching her over the course of the past eight years, four as the Secretary of State within this Administration. And having watched the two debate in 2008- Obama vs. Hillary- there can be little question that the divide that separates them on most issues is a small one. Theirs is a centrist left view of the world. On Foreign Policy, I daresay that Hillary would never have worked for Obama had she held wildly opposing views from his own world view. But the...
Post a Comment
Read more

What hath We Wrought?

If someone waking from a deep freeze just saw that tape where Trump was bragging off the record about the way he treated women, grabbing them by the crotch because they "let you do it", it would seem that so many red flags are raised that they would immediately conclude it as disqualifying for any candidate for higher office. It goes without saying that women are not objects, or something lesser to be grabbed and treated as toys or groped simply because someone believes themselves immune from the rules of polite society, an ethical code of conduct or common human decency. It was obvious that Trump couldn't handle even the small amount of power that is bestowed on a Hollywood TV Reality star. Why would anyone think that this person could handle the immense power and pressure that the highest office in the land entails? That does say something about the voters. Voters didn't vote simply for change, they voted for the strong man who didn't just fall to the top...
Post a Comment
Read more

The "Why Not?" of Hope & Change

The “hopey-changey” thing that Ms. Palin refers to is the stuff that dreams are made of. The reason some politicians succeed where others have failed is predicated upon their ability to convince people to get on board with their pie-in-the sky visions for a better tomorrow.   Starting with FDR, who told us “Happy days are here again” in the middle of the worst Depression in US history, we’ve learned to listen to what our leaders say and take it with a grain of salt. He said we have nothing to fear but fear itself. Actually, as one pundit pointed out recently, that’s not true.   There were a hell of a lot of things to fear during the Great Depression. But Roosevelt made us believe all things are possible.   John F Kennedy said, “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.” With those words, he instilled a generation of young people with hope and passion to change the world by joining the Peace Corps and working to...
Post a Comment
Read more