Skip to main content

The "Why Not?" of Hope & Change


The “hopey-changey” thing that Ms. Palin refers to is the stuff that dreams are made of. The reason some politicians succeed where others have failed is predicated upon their ability to convince people to get on board with their pie-in-the sky visions for a better tomorrow.
 
Starting with FDR, who told us “Happy days are here again” in the middle of the worst Depression in US history, we’ve learned to listen to what our leaders say and take it with a grain of salt. He said we have nothing to fear but fear itself. Actually, as one pundit pointed out recently, that’s not true.  There were a hell of a lot of things to fear during the Great Depression. But Roosevelt made us believe all things are possible.
 
John F Kennedy said, “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.” With those words, he instilled a generation of young people with hope and passion to change the world by joining the Peace Corps and working towards the goal of landing a man on the moon.
 
Reagan used the phrase, “a shining city on the hill” to refer to our Utopian dream of the United States. His campaign phrase, “Morning in America” answered his question, “Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?”
 
George H. Bush (I) spoke of a vision of “a thousand points of light” to generate and inspire us about the future of the United States. And Bill Clinton simply took the metaphor of a bridge to inspire Americans to build a bridge to the twenty-first century.
 
So when Obama came along with the politics of hope and change, many critics loved to trash his lofty and at times quixotic use of language to describe his hope for our future. One of the most prescient observations during Obama’s first inaugural came from someone who said, “Well, of course it won’t last.” The high hopes and exhilarating moments of the campaign were quickly brought down to earth with the very mundane details of governing. As Cuomo said, ‘You campaign in poetry. You govern in prose.”
 
All successful politicians use the language of hope and change. Some of it is pie-in-the-sky, visions of a tomorrow only found in our dreams. But the best Presidents, and the best politicians, still inspire us to dream of things that may never be. Robert Kennedy said it best when he spoke about the hopeful nature of Americans and their dreams. He said, “There are those who look at things the way they are,and ask, 'Why?'  I dream of things that never were and ask, “Why not?”

When we watch politicians at work and feel only cynicism for the things that will never be, we should instead stop ourselves at some point and remember to ask, “Why not?”
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Fifth Risk: A Chillingly Prophetic Narrative for our Time

  For those who have never read this book, ,”The Fifth Risk” is a chillingly prophetic narrative that perfectly embodies the reasoning and set of circumstances that have led us to this point in the pandemic. Not only is there no plan for getting us out of the Pandemic-at least from the Trump Administration- there is instead a decisive narrative which Lewis lays out that allows you to understand why there is a pattern to the idea of simply ‘dropping off the cliff.’   The plan from the beginning, long before the Trump Administration even began to take power, was to break down the walls of governance that had surrounded the Washington agencies for decades prior. Of course, many of Trump’s supporters argue: That is the point! Steve Bannon proudly declared that government would be ‘de-constructed.’ And even those who ended up disagreeing with Trump heavily, such as John Kelly and Rex Tillerson, did help implement the policies that were laid out in the beginning of Trump’s tenur...

Hillary and the Man in the Arena

From the standpoint of one who voted for and endorsed Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton, there seems to be a question hanging in the air. How could someone who opposed the Clintonian dynasty support Hillary’s bid for the Presidency? Isn’t it a bit hypocritical? Or at least inconsistent with the view previously taken? This is true for many supporters of Obama. Some on the left cannot support her bid for President.They see many of her acknowledged flaws and conclude she cannot be a viable option. My view comes from watching her over the course of the past eight years, four as the Secretary of State within this Administration. And having watched the two debate in 2008- Obama vs. Hillary- there can be little question that the divide that separates them on most issues is a small one. Theirs is a centrist left view of the world. On Foreign Policy, I daresay that Hillary would never have worked for Obama had she held wildly opposing views from his own world view. But the...

Katy Bar the Door: The Fall of the House of Reagan

·           Can this Marriage be Saved? There seems to be a disturbance in the force with the Tea Party activists and the rare seldom sighted moderate Republicans all coming out of the woodwork to ask what happened. There seems to be no way to reunite the odd, feuding factions that have erupted into deep schisms in the Republican Party. All one can do is to grab popcorn and stay tuned for what The Donald will do or say next… ·          Can he be Stopped? If you plaster his face at the post office, with the caption below Donald Trump’s picture reading, Can Someone stop this man?, would anyone be able to act? The GOP seems to be in a panic suddenly, as they realize that this man is soon to become the new face of the Grand Old Party.   ·      Old adages do apply: “ Nice Guys Finish Last ” We’ve learned over the course of the last few weeks that those tired old ...