Skip to main content

A Bipartisan Backlash....?



I've been thinking about the bipartisan messaging we have been hearing all week long. 

There is some strong indications that we are getting ready to hear a backlash to the extreme partisanship that has taken hold of not only Washington, but has infiltrated all of our politics over the last ten or twenty years.

The rise of the internet, and the extreme partisan political fights that have taken root from the days of Watergate through to the impeachment of Bill Clinton and on into the Bush years have contributed to this partisan divide. It didn’t help matters when we had the 2000 election debacle with hanging chads and the too close to call Election night and on into the years of Obama and finally the 2016 Election, which was filled with online back and forth bickering and gerrymandered districts and another indecisive win where the popular vote and the Electoral College were out of sync, All of these things were factors that have brought us to this pass.

In this atmosphere, mistrust and bad feelings easily take root and spread. That is one of the reasons we are where we are today. But the tide may be turning. There are more people that register Independent these days, meaning that they are not rabidly identified with one party or another. Young people, in particular seem to want to take a jaundiced eye towards corporate political money machines, the traditional way of choosing candidates and the good old boy money practices that have been used for decades to bring lots of dark money and corporate influence into politics.

One thing that the late John McCain hasn’t gotten enough credit for, in part because his own party doesn’t recognize it as an accomplishment, was the passage of the McCain-Feingold Law that was aimed at taking big money out of politics. The passage of Citizens United in 2010 was one way of negating some of the achievements of this law, but the bipartisan bill was originally designed to bring political campaign fundraising into the light of day and to prevent the types of dark money contributions and big money donors that are rampant in our political campaigns today.

The young people of Parkland, the Women’s March movement, and the progressives as well as some of the original Tea Party movement organizers have all aimed at taking this big money out of the political sphere and have tried to speak out about their unfair influence in our elections. If more young people get involved and vote, and if we are serious about reforming some of the problems inherent in the system, then the wave of young and Independent voters will have to be the catalyst to take up the baton where people with courage like John McCain left off years ago.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hillary and the Man in the Arena

From the standpoint of one who voted for and endorsed Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton, there seems to be a question hanging in the air. How could someone who opposed the Clintonian dynasty support Hillary’s bid for the Presidency? Isn’t it a bit hypocritical? Or at least inconsistent with the view previously taken? This is true for many supporters of Obama. Some on the left cannot support her bid for President.They see many of her acknowledged flaws and conclude she cannot be a viable option. My view comes from watching her over the course of the past eight years, four as the Secretary of State within this Administration. And having watched the two debate in 2008- Obama vs. Hillary- there can be little question that the divide that separates them on most issues is a small one. Theirs is a centrist left view of the world. On Foreign Policy, I daresay that Hillary would never have worked for Obama had she held wildly opposing views from his own world view. But the...

The Fifth Risk: A Chillingly Prophetic Narrative for our Time

  For those who have never read this book, ,”The Fifth Risk” is a chillingly prophetic narrative that perfectly embodies the reasoning and set of circumstances that have led us to this point in the pandemic. Not only is there no plan for getting us out of the Pandemic-at least from the Trump Administration- there is instead a decisive narrative which Lewis lays out that allows you to understand why there is a pattern to the idea of simply ‘dropping off the cliff.’   The plan from the beginning, long before the Trump Administration even began to take power, was to break down the walls of governance that had surrounded the Washington agencies for decades prior. Of course, many of Trump’s supporters argue: That is the point! Steve Bannon proudly declared that government would be ‘de-constructed.’ And even those who ended up disagreeing with Trump heavily, such as John Kelly and Rex Tillerson, did help implement the policies that were laid out in the beginning of Trump’s tenur...

Katy Bar the Door: The Fall of the House of Reagan

·           Can this Marriage be Saved? There seems to be a disturbance in the force with the Tea Party activists and the rare seldom sighted moderate Republicans all coming out of the woodwork to ask what happened. There seems to be no way to reunite the odd, feuding factions that have erupted into deep schisms in the Republican Party. All one can do is to grab popcorn and stay tuned for what The Donald will do or say next… ·          Can he be Stopped? If you plaster his face at the post office, with the caption below Donald Trump’s picture reading, Can Someone stop this man?, would anyone be able to act? The GOP seems to be in a panic suddenly, as they realize that this man is soon to become the new face of the Grand Old Party.   ·      Old adages do apply: “ Nice Guys Finish Last ” We’ve learned over the course of the last few weeks that those tired old ...